“ALL-DIAMOND” RING RAISES QUESTIONS!

by antoinettematlins on March 31, 2012

I’m sure many of you have seen the media surrounding what is being touted as the “world’s largest diamond RING” created by the Swiss jeweler Shawish!

At $68,000,000, and from the sketches they’ve shown, one is led to believe the ring is fashioned entirely from the same stone.  This brings many questions to my mind. First, if you have seen the video and some of the images in the press, it appears to have been cut from a much larger “briolette” cut diamond—which from the images would indicate a diamond in excess of 300 carats, which would certainly have ranked it among the world’s largest diamonds. So do we know of this diamond by another name? And if not, why not? And if one had such a diamond, it must certainly have had a diamond grading report, but there is no description of the quality, especially color and clarity. And what was done with the center portion of the original diamond—a nice carving perhaps, for the vanity table of the owner of the ring? I think this would be very revealing!

More important to my practical nature, if you have such an important diamond, why re-cut it and lose so much weight? Especially in light of the fact that there is always a risk in re-cutting any diamond? And then, of course, I must ask how would one “re-size” it for a particular finger?

I’m also wondering who cut it; it would take a master diamond cutter.

Of course, we’re all assuming it’s fashioned from a natural, single diamond. But is this an accurate assumption? It’s becoming more and more difficult to know for sure whether or not a diamond is natural or lab-grown; at the moment, major labs are confident that they are able to distinguish natural from lab-grown, but with the amassed experience of diamond growers and technological advances, is this reality? There are rumors about large colorless lab-grown diamonds already in the market — a topic that will be addressed in a couple months at a major conference on the future of diamonds (for anyone interested in knowing more about the conference, visit the Accredited Gemologist Association website: www.accreditedgemologists.org).
I’m not suggesting this diamond ring is lab-grown, but it would certainly make much more sense if it were! Or if it were assembled from more than one diamond. In short, it raises lots of unanswered questions. I think this is a story to which we should all stay tuned!

{ 0 comments }

Why Consumers Are Willing To Pay More For Ruby Than Garnet

by antoinettematlins on March 31, 2012

I’ve just had a question on one of the social media sites asking why a ruby costs so much more than a garnet. Since they are both “red,” the writer pointed out, why were consumers willing to pay so much more for ruby? He wondered if it was because of the particular shade of color, or the stone’s “shine” that resulted in such consumer preference. Since he’s been in the emerald field for many years, it occurred to me that the fuller answer to this question may not be “self-evident” and should be addressed briefly.

It’s fairly complex, but essentially, price relates to “RARITY” which is largely connected to QUALITY and CACHET. Fine quality gems are rarer than low-quality, and adding to that we have the “cachet” — the mystique/myth/history/associations to royalty and so on–that contributes to demand for some gems being much greater than for other gems. The well-known gems — diamond, ruby, sapphire and emerald — are very rare in natural, beautiful quality stones, and the larger the size, the rarer! Demand is also strong. So supply doesn’t keep up with demand, and prices keep getting stronger. As prices go up and the supply of naturally fine quality stones decreases, treatments are introduced in order to meet demand for a “real” ruby, sapphire, emerald, etc, but at prices consumers can afford to pay. There are also various types of treatments — some more extreme than others — and rarity/price then reflects the specific type and degree of treatment present in a specific stone.

Let’s look at ruby as an example. A genuine ruby that is untreated — and beautiful — is one of the rarest of all gems, and as the size increases, it becomes even rarer and rarer and costlier and costlier. As more and more people found they were unable to afford a beautiful natural ruby, treatments were introduced–initially this meant the use only of heating which melted some of the inclusions to improve brightness with a resulting improvement in color as well–and then sold at a more affordable price. Here everyone was happy because the buyer still had a “real ruby,” at a price they could afford. And treaters agreed that they were only  extending “nature’s” heating process to accomplish this, with nothing artificial being added. But after some decades, supply of material that could be sufficiently improved by heating alone also became too scarce to meet demand, so new types of treatments entered the market to make even lower quality “corundum” (the mineral that is called ruby when red, sapphire when blue, and ‘fancy’ color sapphire when it occurs in other colors) look beautiful; this meant they could meet increased demand–even greater demand if the upward trend continued–at much lower prices. And so it has gone.

Now many more colored gemstones are treated in some way, some minimally and others extensively; when properly represented, you can see the significant differences in pricing that reflect the type–and degree–of treatment.

In terms of the original question about garnet, the supply of nice quality red garnet is still very common, and outpaces demand, so it is also very affordable. Interestingly, however, it is one of only a very few gemstones today that are truly natural; virtually all  ruby, sapphire and emerald have been treated in some manner, to varying degrees. Some of the lesser known gemstones, however, still offer rare, natural options that are beautiful and more costly–and also increasing in price. These include emerald-green garnet (called tsavorite) and intense orange garnet (called mandarin) and red, pink, blue and violet spinels. Here again, it’s rarity, quality, size, and DEMAND that drive the prices. Other gems that have not historically been “routinely” treated include not only the garnet and spinel families, but also alexandrite, chrysoberyl, peridot, chrome tourmaline, moonstone, and iolite, to name a few. Sadly, this is now changing as well; while natural gems can still be found among them, we’re already seeing heated spinel and fillers in fractures in garnets, peridot, chrysoberyl, and so on. This is why most buyers today who spend a lot of money on a gem want documentation from a respected gem-testing laboratory.

I hope that this helps answer your question. And aren’t you glad I didn’t give a the “long” explanation on this topic! But that’s why I’ve had to write books…in order to explain such things more carefully and thoroughly…..

{ 3 comments }

Clarity Grades on Diamond Reports Can Be Misleading!

March 22, 2012

I was recently following a jewelry industry thread on one of the social media sites and the subject of clarity enhancement came up. One of the conversations then led to a discussion of laser enhancement–a technique whereby one can laser down to an inclusion — usually black or dark in color — and then introduce [...]

Read the full article →

Treated Gems Acceptable But Treatment Non-Disclosure Is NOT!

February 18, 2012

I was recently following a discussion on one of the gemology groups to which I belong, and thought that it might be useful to introduce it here in my blog. The writer was pointing out that gemstone treatments seem to be much more prevalent among colored gemstones than is the case with diamonds. He also [...]

Read the full article →

BREAKING NEWS! Matlins’ Ruby Exposé on ABC Confirmed by GIA: Lead-Glass Rubies Now Categorized as Manufactured, Artificial Product

February 16, 2012

As many of you are aware, Craig Lynch and I have been heading the Accredited Gemologists Association’s (AGA) efforts in fighting—for over four years—to have laboratories classify lead-glass “ruby” as an artificial product. We, along with other AGA members, have written extensively for the trade press and have given workshops all over the country to [...]

Read the full article →

Lead-Glass “Ruby” Now Officially Called Manufactured, Artificial Product

February 10, 2012

As many of you are aware, the Accredited Gemologists Association (AGA) has been fighting for the past 4 years to have laboratories identify lead-glass “ruby” as an artificial product. Craig Lynch and I, along with other AGA members, have written extensively for the trade press and given workshops all over the country to alert the [...]

Read the full article →

Failure of 57,000 Carat “Emerald” To Sell Is No Surprise … But Arrest of Owner IS

January 29, 2012

As I sat at the airport awaiting my flight to Tucson, for the world’s largest gem/mineral show, and contemplating whether or not to buy a pair of roller blades to more quickly navigate the many shows, I received yet another email pertaining to the “rare, valuable 57,000 carat ‘emerald”’ that was to be sold at [...]

Read the full article →

JCK News Makes MY Holiday Brighter

December 22, 2011

I’ve been so busy lately I haven’t had time to post anything for a couple weeks, but I was so happy to read the following in JCK online that I just had to encourage each of you to follow the link and read this article: http://www.jckonline.com/2011/12/21/beware-glass-filled-ruby-trade-warns I want you to know that this has been the [...]

Read the full article →

Elizabeth Taylor’s Jewels

December 5, 2011

Some things are worth waiting for, and standing in long lines to view Elizabeth Taylor’s jewels is one of them! I was among the first admitted to the viewing when it opened on Saturday (thanks to my being a “regular” at Christie’s for 30 years and having been given a VIP pass), and it made [...]

Read the full article →

Natural or Treated…Only the FIRST Question You SHOULD Be Asking

November 30, 2011

The topic on one of the internet discussion groups this week was treated gemstones, the consensus being that there is nothing wrong with treated gemstones–or synthetics or imitations–as long as the buyer “discloses” what the product is and that it is treated. But it seemed to me after reading the various comments that by “disclosure” [...]

Read the full article →

WordPress Admin